Embedded Files
Good news: TV Series Part1 ep1-5 and Part2, ep1-4 just released .
Behind Jensen Huang's "Affair Scandal": The Capillaries of Capital and the Geopolitical Games of Empire
By Canyang Ruxue ("Blood-Red Setting Sun") · November 10, 2026 · Source: Junguozhi
The enormous development of the productive forces will ultimately burst the cage of private ownership. … Awakened people all over the world are coming to see ever more clearly that so long as the means of production remain in the hands of a tiny handful of monopoly-capitalist oligarchs, and so long as science and technology remain tools of imperialist rivalry and the exploitation of working people, scandals, crises and geopolitical conflicts of this kind will never cease.
[Image caption: "Jensen Huang Admits Affair; Nvidia Investigates His Ties to Suspected Chinese Spy" — The New York Times Chinese Edition]
Behind Jensen Huang's "Affair Scandal": The Capillaries of Capital and the Geopolitical Games of Empire
Recently, Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of Nvidia, the colossus of the global artificial intelligence industry, took the rare step of publicly admitting, on the company's official website and in an internal letter, that he had been unfaithful to his wife. The confession set off a seismic shock through global capital markets and geopolitical circles alike. As the identity of the other woman came to light (Alice Huang, an executive at the Singapore-based computing firm Megaspeed), and as a cascade of consequences followed (national-security inquiries from the U.S. Congress, an independent investigation launched by Nvidia's board, statements from politicians, and violent swings in the stock price), what might have been just another lurid story for the Western tabloids was instantly drawn into the grand narrative of great-power technological rivalry.
As serious Marxist researchers, we must not fall into the quagmire of the mainstream capitalist media, which strips away the macro-level geo-economic context and reduces everything to moral judgment or voyeuristic frenzy. The eruption of Huang's affair scandal and the storm surrounding it is no accidental lapse in one man's personal morality. It is the inevitable manifestation of contemporary monopoly capitalism along several dimensions at once: the personification of capital, the transnational plunder of finance capital, the intervention of the bourgeois state apparatus, and the contradictions among imperialist powers.
[Image caption: "Jensen Huang Affair | Netizens Dig Up the Other Woman, Alice Huang: 'Ultra-HD' Intimate WeChat Photos Leaked in Full"]
I. The "Personification" of Capital and the Fetishism of Symbolic Commodities: The Collapse of the "Devoted Husband" Image and the Hypocrisy of Monopoly Capital
The capitalist has never been an abstract moral subject. He is "capital personified."[note 1] As monopoly capitalism has developed, and as joint-stock corporations and the modern media industry have swollen to enormous proportions, the individual capitalist no longer merely performs the function of extracting surplus value. He is also packaged as a distinctive kind of "symbolic commodity": the personified embodiment of the corporation's brand equity.
For years, the Western mainstream media and the promoters of capital cast Jensen Huang as a technological ascetic of humble origins and unyielding perseverance, clad in his trademark black leather jacket, and bound him tightly to the image of a devoted husband of more than forty years.
Within the communications matrix of contemporary digital capitalism, such an image is in essence a form of high-value-added "intangible symbolic capital."
It conveys an ideological illusion to small and medium investors around the world, to Silicon Valley engineers, and to consumers: that the giants of monopoly capital possess not only superb technical rationality but also an old-fashioned moral self-discipline and the steady, contractual integrity of long-termism.
This illusion forms a psychological prop and a foundation of trust that cannot be overlooked in Nvidia's valuation of hundreds of billions, even trillions, of dollars.
"When the personal vessel of capital strays beyond the moral boundaries set by the social contract and bourgeois right, what follows is not merely the breakdown of a family, but the shattering of capitalism's symbolic fetishism."
Yet when Huang publicly admitted the affair and his devoted-husband image collapsed overnight, the capital markets convulsed, with the share price plunging and market value evaporating. This was not prudishness. It was capital suddenly waking up to the fact that the "key-person risk" built on personality cults and founder worship could at any moment detonate a crisis of confidence across an entire capitalist empire.
In the logic of capital, private morality has never been a purely private matter. It is alienated directly into a risk variable affecting the realization of corporate profit and the circulation and turnover of shares. This lays bare the utilitarian essence behind the moral mask of the bourgeoisie: all human relationships, emotional bonds, even marriage itself, are in the end nothing more than appendages subordinated to the self-expansion of capital in the face of its total commodification of life.
II. Imperialist Geopolitics and the Plunder of the Computing-Power Chain: A Political-Economic Deconstruction of the Scandal
If the affair exposed the moral hypocrisy of the capitalist as capital personified, then the other core element of the story, the Singapore computing firm Megaspeed and its deep entanglement with the Chinese market, tears away the sentimental veil of the so-called "free market" and "fair competition," exposing in full the greed and brutality at the heart of contemporary monopoly capital.
[Image caption: "Taiwan Becomes a Haven for Illicit Trysts: Timeline of Jensen Huang's Affair with 'Chinese Female Spy'" — International / Breaking International News]
According to foreign media reports, Megaspeed, where Alice Huang works, is a Singapore-headquartered company whose core business includes leasing GPU computing power to enterprises in mainland China, such as cloud-computing giants like Alibaba.
In recent years the United States has imposed stringent semiconductor export controls on China, seeking to build what it calls a "small yard, high fence"[note 2] and a technological iron curtain. Against this backdrop, the global flow of computing resources has been forcibly drawn into the winch of imperialist geopolitics.
As the absolute monopolist of the foundational infrastructure of global AI, the GPU, Nvidia produces chips that are not only "means of production" for realizing super-profits but also strategic weapons with which the United States consolidates its global technological hegemony.
"Capital eschews no profit, or very small profit, just as Nature was formerly said to abhor a vacuum."[note 3] However hard the American imperialist state apparatus wields the big stick of sanctions to cut off China's digital economy from cutting-edge computing power, capital's instinct to chase the highest rate of profit cannot be suppressed.
China's vast digital market, its immense reserves of data, and its urgent demand for computing power form a source of super-profits that global capital simply cannot resist. And so, between transnational capital, offshore intermediaries, the Singapore computing hub and the Chinese market, chain after chain of "underground" or "gray" computing-power supply is inevitably woven, spontaneously or semi-spontaneously, slipping through the imperialist blockade.
The intersection of Alice Huang and Jensen Huang, from a drinking party at Computex Taipei in 2024 to the multibillion-dollar GPU purchases and business entertaining of 2025, is a microcosm of transnational monopoly capital threading its way through the fissures of geopolitics in pursuit of super-profits, at a time when globalization is ebbing and imperialist antagonisms are sharpening.
The reason the affair escalated so quickly into wild speculation about "national security" and "Chinese spies" is precisely that the American ruling class has realized, to its horror, that before capital's all-pervasive drive to expand, any imperialist political iron curtain can be eaten away by the capillaries of capital. Between the transnational nature of capital and the national chauvinism of the imperialist state, an irreconcilable structural contradiction has erupted.
III. From the Board's Independent Investigation to the Statements of Politicians
After the scandal broke, Nvidia's board quickly set up a special committee of independent directors to review possible conflicts of interest, while the U.S. Congress, the relevant regulators, and politicians (including such spokesmen of capital as Trump and Musk) all intervened or weighed in.
As Lenin wrote in The State and Revolution: "The state is an organ of class rule, an organ for the oppression of one class by another." In capitalist society, so-called "corporate governance," "compliance review" and "independent investigation" are by no means supra-class, purely rational instruments of technical management. They are mechanisms of disciplinary power set up by the bourgeois state apparatus and its agents to protect the interests of the bourgeoisie as a whole and to safeguard the secure operation of monopoly capital.
Now that Nvidia has grown into a super-monopoly worth trillions of dollars and holding the lifeline of the global AI industry, it is no longer an ordinary private company. It is a core strategic pillar of America's system of state-monopoly capitalism. At this point, whether Huang's private conduct involved leaking undisclosed product roadmaps, chip allocation quotas or other sensitive commercial information to a third party (especially an executive linked to a potential competitor or geopolitical rival) bears directly on whether the United States can maintain its monopoly advantage on the strategic high ground of artificial intelligence, the field that will decide the world's future.
The intervention of Congress and the board is therefore, in essence, a "political audit" and a "loyalty test" administered by the bourgeois state apparatus to an agent of monopoly capital.
[Image caption: "Trump Responds to Jensen Huang's Affair: 'He's a Very Good Man, I Haven't Heard He Did Anything Wrong'" — Germany / News / Huaren Toutiao]
The remarks of Trump and his ilk reflect the pragmatic calculus within the American ruling bloc over how to weigh "capital efficiency" against "national security." So long as Huang can keep earning astronomical super-profits for American imperialism's technological hegemony and preserve America's monopoly position in technology, his private moral failings can be downgraded under the protection of power. Should his personal relationships prove to pose a substantive threat to American geopolitical strategy, however, the bourgeois state apparatus will discard him without hesitation as an expendable pawn. This thoroughly punctures the myth of the "independence and impartiality" of bourgeois right and the free market.
I
V. The Blood and Tears of the Digital Proletariat and the Alienation of Technology
When we turn our gaze away from the glittering dinner parties of Taipei, the trading floors of Wall Street and the hearing rooms of Washington, and look out at the wider world, the absurdity of this storm becomes plain.
While Silicon Valley's capitalist titans and transnational executives panic over tabloid gossip and swings of tens of billions in their fortunes, the "digital proletariat" across the globe is enduring exploitation of unprecedented cruelty. There are the chip-fabrication workers in the semiconductor foundries of East and Southeast Asia, toiling at full tilt day and night and exposed to toxic chemicals. There are the millions of low-wage laborers in the Global South performing vast amounts of tedious data labeling for large AI models. And there are the countless small tech firms and ordinary workers whose survival is threatened by the monopoly on computing power. They create the real social wealth and surplus value, yet they are stripped of any control over the means of production and the fruits of technology.
Under capitalist private ownership, the science, technology and productive forces created by human beings have not become instruments of human liberation and free development. Instead, they have been alienated into a hostile force that oppresses and dominates people, and even drives them toward mutual destruction in imperialist rivalry.
In the grip of monopoly capital, artificial intelligence and massive computing power have become accomplices in extracting surplus value, conducting global surveillance and widening the digital divide.
Jensen Huang's personal fortune exceeds $160 billion. Every increment of his family's wealth is congealed surplus labor appropriated without payment from the proletariat of the world. The scandals of his personal life are nothing more than the inevitable expression, in its late and decaying stage, of a highly privileged bourgeois way of life.
Lenin incisively showed that the imperialist stage is marked by parasitism and decay. The pinnacle of monopoly capitalism is accompanied precisely by extreme spiritual emptiness, moral degeneration, and the total alienation of the capitalist's personality.
V. Conclusion
The Jensen Huang affair scandal, and the upheaval it set off in the computing-power chain, the regulatory storm and the geopolitical tug-of-war that followed, is by no means an isolated piece of salacious entertainment news or a simple corporate compliance crisis.
It is a microcosmic manifestation of the contradictions of the present era of monopoly capitalism. It vividly sketches the greedy nature of monopoly capital, the ruthless struggles of imperialist geopolitics, the class character of the bourgeois state apparatus, and the irreconcilable internal contradictions of capitalism itself.
The enormous development of the productive forces will ultimately burst the cage of private ownership. Nvidia's GPUs illuminate the future of artificial intelligence, yet they also illuminate the decay and impotence of the capitalist system. Awakened people all over the world are coming to see ever more clearly that so long as the means of production remain in the hands of a tiny handful of monopoly-capitalist oligarchs, and so long as science and technology remain tools of imperialist rivalry and the exploitation of working people, scandals, crises and geopolitical conflicts of this kind will never cease.
Only by thoroughly abolishing the privileges of monopoly capital and establishing public ownership of the means of production and planned production for all humankind can technology truly serve the good. Only then can science and technology become a transformative force carrying all of humanity toward freedom, equality and liberation, rather than chips to be gambled by a privileged few in their life of extravagance and their geopolitical games. This is the clearest and most profound conclusion we should draw from this tangled capitalist farce.
Translator's notes
[note 1] "Capital personified" is Marx's phrase from Capital, Vol. I, where he describes the capitalist as "capital personified and endowed with consciousness and a will."
[note 2] "Small yard, high fence" refers to the U.S. policy approach of imposing very strict controls on a narrow set of critical technologies, especially advanced semiconductors, while leaving other trade relatively open.
[note 3] This line is from a footnote in Capital, Vol. I, Chapter 31, where Marx quotes the British trade unionist T. J. Dunning. The Chinese version is often attributed to Marx himself. The rendering above follows the standard English text of Marx's citation.
A note for your publishing: these events took place after my knowledge cutoff, so I haven't verified the article's factual claims about Huang, Alice Huang or Megaspeed. Since the piece makes serious allegations about named individuals, you may want to keep the source attributions in the image captions visible.
Page updated
Report abuse